Mook Review: The Descendants

The Descendants  Written by Kaui Hart Hemmings

The Descendants Kaui Hart Hemmings Book

via strangecultureblog.com

I recently took a vacation out to Hawaii to visit some of my friends from college.  During the trip, I read The Descendants, which was the perfect beach read for my vacation considering it takes place all over the Hawaiian islands.  I’d heard wonderful things about the novel alone and, after some major nominations and huge wins during award season, I knew the movie had to be touching and amazing as well.  Hemmings writes with an ease and fluidity that is uniquely impressive.  The Descendants is smooth and simple on the surface, with a much deeper meaning.  Narrated by Matt Kinga husband, father, and landowner who is facing many life-changing obstaclesthis story is one where anyone can relate even though the actual plot is far off course than the average person could imagine.  The characters struggle in different ways on varying levels, but they reveal something that not all fictional characters do: humility.

The Kings, descendants of a royal Hawaiian ancestry and owners of one of the last true pieces of Hawaiian land, face an impending land sale with family trust in Matts’ hands.  However, when Matt learns that his wife Joanie, who is comatose and dying, engaged in an affair during the last year of their marriage, his life course quickly changes. Matt sets out on a journey with his two daughters, 17 year old Alex and 10 year old Scottie (as well as Alex’s boyfriend Sid), to find Joanie’s lover and give him the opportunity to say goodbye to her before her death.

The thing I loved about The Descendants was that each character truly served a purpose.  Matt, who we learn is labeled by others as unemotional and distant, is incredibly passionate (although inwardly so) about the people he loves most – his family.  Both Alex and Scottie, while distinctly different in personality, show how far removed Matt is from parenting as they are both brash and out of his control.  The character I felt had the most redeeming qualities was Sid; a supporting character, but one who attributes to the novels meaning and plot turns.  Sid is the result of his own set of family struggles, having just lost his father, and becomes the one responsible for the major turning point in the book.

I really enjoyed The Descendants.  It was an easy read that was still dense and heartfelt, and left you actually feeling something at the end of the journey.  I definitely recommend reading this book!

“The Descendants” Directed by Alexander Payne

The Descendants, Alexander Payne, George Clooney, Movie, Film

via IMDB.com

I had high expectations for this movie.  Considering it won the Oscar for “Best Adapted Screenplay” and two Golden Globes (“Best Picture – Drama” and George Clooney for “Best Actor – Drama”) I felt that “The Descendants” needed to live up to the high standard on which it had been placed.  Truthfully, it did not disappoint.  It was a wonderful film and the screenplay, written by Kaui Hart Hemmings herself, definitely did the novel justice.  Yet, despite the positive reactions to this movie, there were a few changes that I just flat-out did not understand.  It didn’t necessarily hinder the quality of the movie but it had me questioning why the changes were made at all.

First off, Joanie’s name was changed to Elizabeth.  I’ve done some investigating (not very intensely, but a search nonetheless) on why this happened.  Usually, if a name changes from page to screen, there is some sort of reasoning behind it.  Maybe two main characters had names that have too similar pronunciation and may therefore confuse the viewer, or maybe a name is too representative of some sort of historical or popular media figure.  Regardless, there is no explanation  of why “Joanie” changed to “Elizabeth” and it caught me off guard.

My major qualm with the movie was Sid.  In the novel, Sid serves the plot and holds an actual place within the story.  In the movie, Sid’s role is relatively meaningless aside from comedic relief.  He does nothing.  And I am sure many viewers were confused why such a character was written into the story at all.  There is no exposition of his difficult past with his father (we only find out that he has passed away in a drunk driving accident) and he doesn’t have anything to do with the relationship between Brian and Julie Speer.  He does not call Julie and tell her of her husbands infidelity – he doesn’t even interact with her once in the film!  So, my question to Hemmings is, why bother to leave him in as a character?  In my opinion, the movie would have functioned exactly the same without him.

I also felt that Scottie’s role was played down a bit.  We obviously can see that she is a disturbed kid, but the most excruciating moments we find in the book were missing in the movie.  I understand time restraints must have affected this but I wished they found some sort of way to emphasize how screwed up Scottie was.

One thing that really stood out with me in this movie was the music.  A musical score can make or break a movie, and in “The Descendants” the music was perfectly fitting and timely with the films’ succession. Overall, I enjoyed “The Descendants” but I don’t think it was the best adaptation ever made.  Certainly not one deserving of an Oscar.  There were silly changes made that could have been avoided and, if it were me, I just would have done things differently.

Mook Rating  ★★★

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Mook Review: The Descendants

  1. Great review, as always. Sounds like the book is a must read. I’m very forgetful with names, so the name change probably wouldn’t have fazed me. But superfluous characters? Maybe they thought eliminating them would anger the book fans?

  2. I haven’t read the book, but I am a fan of the film. I agree, however, that the movie wasn’t perfect. I’m curious, what did you think of how the family land drama played into the film? I thought that it was kind of random and heavy handed…it just felt strange to me that the film was suddenly summarized in a metaphor about family and land and legacy. (It’s been a while since I saw the film, so, excuse me if I’m not being clear, or if I’m just plain wrong). Was the story line better integrated in the book?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s